A full care order was granted in respect of a separated minor following an uncontested application under S.18. The court heard evidence from both the social worker and the guardian ad litem (GAL) and was satisfied that the statutory threshold was met.
The social worker gave evidence that the child had arrived in the jurisdiction from an Asian country, having left due to issues connected to his father’s involvement in a political party. The father is deceased. The social worker confirmed that the precise journey undertaken by the child was unclear, but that he had presented on arrival as a vulnerable minor. He was currently in a residential placement where he was engaging with staff and beginning to settle.
In relation to education, the social worker outlined that the child was attending school but had experienced difficulties, including bullying. An incident was described where other students threw paper at him, which was followed up by the school, including threats of suspension for those involved. A further threat had been made subsequently. The social worker confirmed that a meeting with the school was being arranged and that the issue had been addressed “relatively quickly”.
The child was described as somewhat isolated within his class, though he had made friends within his wider community. He was engaging in activities such as swimming, cricket and gym attendance, and was being encouraged to participate more fully. His independent living skills were noted to be positive, with staff complimenting his cooking, and he was described as gradually “coming out of his shell”.
In relation to his immigration status, the social worker confirmed that his application for international protection had been refused, with findings that his account lacked credibility. An appeal had been lodged and remained under review.
The GAL supported the application and confirmed the contents of his report. She described the placement as suitable and stable, referring to it as “a lovely Victorian house” which would sustain the child. She noted that the child had spoken of feeling somewhat lonely but was beginning to develop friendships within the placement. The GAL also highlighted ongoing concerns in relation to bullying, describing recent incidents as “very disappointing”, but emphasised that the child was “a very impressive young man, well rounded, and confident”.
The GAL confirmed that the child had expressed a wish for family reunification, which would depend on the outcome of his immigration appeal. The GAL indicated a willingness to remain involved for a further period to support the child, particularly in addressing the bullying issues.
In his ruling, the Judge noted that the application was uncontested and that the Court had the benefit of both the social work and GAL reports. He stated that the child appeared to be doing relatively well since his arrival, but expressed concern regarding the school situation, including an incident “as recently as yesterday”, which required resolution.
The judge described the child as a “well rounded, confident young man” and expressed the hope that the identified issues would be addressed. He was satisfied that the evidence met the statutory threshold under S.18 and granted a full care order until the child reaches the age of 18. The matter was directed to return before the court in approximately three months, with the GAL to remain involved in the interim.